Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing officer imposes $5,000 fine on Westport Avenue storefront for occupying without permits

2978899 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Feb. 6 Norwalk zoning hearing, the hearing officer ordered a $5,000 fine against the business at 336 Westport Avenue after the city presented evidence the store was occupied without required zoning and sign permits.

Norwalk City hearing officer Robert Maslow on Feb. 6 ordered a $5,000 fine against the business operating at 336 Westport Avenue after city zoning staff presented photographs and inspections showing the store open and displaying multiple unpermitted signs.

The hearing officer based the penalty on testimony from zoning inspector Hall, who described multiple violations including occupancy without a zoning application and several unauthorized signs. Hall told the hearing that the citation had been served and that the city received a signed return receipt: "the citation was sent on the tenth of this month" and "I got that back in our office on the eighteenth." Maslow said he would impose a fine: "So I'm gonna close a fine of $5,000."

Why this matters: Norwalk enforces traffic- and safety-related requirements for tenant fit-outs and signage through zoning and building permits; the hearing record shows the property lacked the required occupancy approvals and had multiple unpermitted wall and window signs. Hall told the hearing the business failed to respond to the city's notices and had not submitted the required floor plans and permit applications.

Supporting details: Hall said his office photographed the store on Jan. 2 and again Jan. 31 and found the same signs and no pending applications. Maslow noted the citation procedure and the timeframes required by the city's enforcement process before imposing a monetary penalty. A staff member, Blaine, told the hearing he had reviewed the file and offered his opinion that the property remained out of compliance.

Outcome and next steps: Maslow assessed a $5,000 fine and said he would reissue citations as needed to bring the property into compliance. Hall said the office will resend the citation documents to attempt to reengage the owner and to generate required permit applications.

Context and process notes: The violation list cited in Hall's memo included the requirement to file a zoning application to occupy a business space (recorded in the file as an internal zoning provision referenced during the hearing) and multiple sign violations tied to tenant fit-up and window signage. The hearing record shows the city used evidence from on-site inspections and photographs to support enforcement.