Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

CDRC approves Montara addition and deck replacement with condition to show shielded lighting

April 12, 2025 | San Mateo County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

CDRC approves Montara addition and deck replacement with condition to show shielded lighting
April 10, 2025 — The San Mateo County Coastal Design Review Committee approved a design review permit Thursday for additions and remodeling at a single‑family residence at 840 Edison Street in Montara, finding the project exempt from CEQA under the existing‑facilities exemption.

Staff described the project (file TLN2024‑00313) as a 339‑square‑foot first‑floor addition, a 65‑square‑foot second‑story addition, and a 407‑square‑foot deck replacement on a parcel listed in the staff report as 625 square feet; the presentation also referenced a combined total that staff and the applicant discussed during the hearing. The project includes minor grading and removal of one tree, and staff recommended the committee determine the project exempt under CEQA Guidelines section 15301(e) (Class 1: additions to existing structures under certain thresholds). The application was deemed complete March 11, 2025; Randall Cohen was listed as the project planner.

The applicant’s representative described filling in a narrow rear void to enlarge the kitchen and said the front of the house will remain unchanged. New windows are proposed to be vinyl with black exterior frames and white interiors to replace older aluminum windows. The committee asked that exterior lighting be shown as fully shielded on final plans; the applicant said shielded fixtures would be used and that plans would be clarified to show that detail.

A motion to approve carried on a roll‑call vote with April Bingham and Moshe Porter recorded as voting yes. The committee’s conditions included providing details of shielded exterior lighting on the final plan set and clarifying that new exterior finishes match existing materials where applicable.

The staff report noted the project is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission and listed the planner and application completeness date.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal