Planned-unit proposal for manufactured-home community sparks questions on ownership model; council asks staff to draft development agreement

2969319 · April 12, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposed manufactured-home planned unit development, Legacy B Estates, drew detailed questions at the Parowan City Council work session April 10 about the ownership model, financing and protections for residents; council asked staff to prepare a development agreement to set terms.

During the April 10 work session the council heard a presentation on Legacy B Estates, a proposed planned-unit development that would use manufactured homes to increase the stock of lower-cost owner-occupied housing in Parowan.

The developer and project representatives described a model in which the developer retains ownership of common land and sells or places manufactured homes on privately financed foundations; residents would pay a lease or space rent for their site and could later remove a unit under state affidavit procedures. Council members and the developer discussed financing, minimum unit sizes, whether spaces would be leased or sold with deeded land, CCRs and the need for a development agreement to spell out timing for water-right dedication, impact fees and maintenance responsibilities.

Why it matters: The proposal would add entry-level home options the developers say lower monthly housing costs compared with conventional site-built home mortgages. Council members pressed for clarity on who carries long-term maintenance obligations, whether occupants will be screened (background checks are proposed for on-site residency), how rent escalation will be limited and how units may be removed or sold.

Next steps: Staff agreed to prepare a development agreement to memorialize the commitments discussed (water dedication timing, impact fee treatment, lot-by-lot foundation timing, CCR enforcement and resident protections such as an annual or five-year rebasing mechanism tied to a CPI measure). The developer said it will provide additional documentation — home specifications and financing options — for the council’s next review.

Ending: The council did not take action; staff will draft the development agreement language for council review and formal consideration at a future meeting.