Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Urban Renewal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tupelo opens public hearings on urban renewal plan and development-code amendment; no public comments and no action taken
Summary
Council opened public hearings on a proposed third amended and restated urban renewal plan and a proposed amendment to Chapter 4 of the development code; no members of the public spoke and the council took no votes on either item at this meeting.
Get email alerts on the Planning Urban Renewal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Tupelo City Council opened public hearings on two planning items — a third amended and restated urban renewal plan and a proposed amendment to Chapter 4 of the city’s development code — and recorded that no members of the public were present to speak on either matter.
City staff moved both items up on the agenda for consideration, but the council stated it would not take action on the urban renewal resolution — which the agenda described as a resolution finding that notice of the public hearing had been duly published as required by law — and similarly did not act on the proposed development-code amendment at this meeting.
Why it matters: Changes to an urban renewal plan or the development code can affect land use, redevelopment incentives and local permitting rules. The council’s decision not to act this evening leaves those proposals at the study or consideration stage.
Details from the meeting
• Public hearing opened for the third amended and restated urban renewal plan; no speakers came forward. The agenda included a resolution to find and determine that notice of the public hearing had been published as required by law; the council moved the item up on the study agenda but did not adopt the resolution at this meeting.
• Public hearing opened for a proposed amendment to Chapter 4 of the Development Code; no speakers came forward. The item was moved up on the study agenda for later consideration.
• The council closed the public-agenda portion and returned to regular session without taking votes on either planning item.
Next steps
Both items remain on the council’s study agenda for further consideration; the record indicates the council intends to continue review at a future meeting. When the council takes formal action it will be reflected in a future agenda and meeting minutes.

