Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Labor Vloggers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee amends, releases bill to extend child-labor protections to minors working as vloggers
Summary
Assembly Bill 4302, amended by the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, would treat some minor content creators under child-labor protections similar to child actors and require recordkeeping where a minor’s participation exceeds a 30% time threshold; the committee released the amended bill after debate and two abstentions.
The New Jersey General Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee amended and released Assembly Bill 4302, which would amend state child-labor law to protect minors who work as vloggers or produce online video content in certain circumstances. Committee members debated how to measure and document a minor’s participation in content and whether the recordkeeping requirements could discourage creators.
Assemblywoman Simmons, the bill sponsor, told the committee the measure “establishes a separate category with an existing statute to protect children who are essentially performing on content creation as minors,” comparing protections to those that apply to child actors. Committee staff read the amended bill summary into the record; the committee amendments refine the definition of "name," clarify which records must be maintained and provided to minors engaged in vlog work, update the bill synopsis and make technical changes.
A committee member raised concerns about the practical burden on creators and parents, noting that some minors may appear in videos but not be actively contributing and that tracking time could be onerous. Simmons said the bill uses a 30% threshold and requires the adult content creator or parent to log time and that formulas are available to help calculate participation, likening the accountability to that required for child actors on television or stage.
On the motion to amend and release, Assemblyman McGuckin said he could not support the bill because he felt it “interferes with the family relationship” and preferred parents make such decisions; he recorded an abstention. Assemblywoman Meyer also abstained, saying she “fully support[s] the intent of the legislation, but I just think it it could have more of a, potentially the opposite effect on people that make these type of things.” The recorded roll call: McGuckin — abstain; Meyer — abstain; Miller — yes; Simmons — yes; Maranco — yes; Swain — yes; Chairman Tully — yes. The amended bill was released to the next steps in the legislative process.
Next steps: because the bill amends child-labor law and imposes recordkeeping and thresholds tied to a minor’s time on camera, the committee and sponsor indicated implementation would rely on guidance and standard accounting formulas for participation time.
