Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stuttering Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly committee advances bill to require insurance coverage for stuttering treatment after testimony from advocates and clinicians
Summary
The committee amended and released Assembly Bill 5133, which would require health insurers and Medicaid to cover treatment for stuttering. Testimony from adult and youth advocates and a Rutgers speech‑language pathologist emphasized early treatment’s benefits; health plan representatives sought technical clarifications.
Get email alerts on the Stuttering Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The New Jersey Assembly Health Committee amended and released Assembly Bill 5133 on a motion during its session after advocates, clinicians and family members testified in favor of requiring health insurance and Medicaid coverage for treatment of stuttering.
Advocates including former NBA player Michael Kidd‑Gilchrist and two youth advocates described personal and educational impacts of stuttering and urged coverage beyond school-based services. ‘‘For us who stutter as adults and as kids at times, it’s very, very hard and challenging… I see this as me just putting an effort and time into my own state,’’ Michael Kidd‑Gilchrist said while urging support for the bill.
Celeste Domch, a speech‑language pathologist and associate professor at Rutgers, testified on clinical evidence and outcomes. Domch said stuttering typically emerges in preschool and that ‘‘a 4‑year‑old who receives appropriate speech therapy has a 75 percent chance of recovering from stuttering,’’ adding that therapy improves school participation, self‑confidence and long‑term outcomes. Domch emphasized that school‑based services (IEP/504) can address some needs but do not always generalize to communication outside school and that gaps exist for preschoolers and adults who no longer qualify for school services.
Supporters said the bill would remove barriers created by insurance exclusions and session caps, and provide coverage when families do not qualify for or cannot access school‑based therapy. Witnesses described limits on session counts and lifetime caps under some plans and urged coverage to enable early intervention and continued treatment into adulthood when needed.
Representatives from health plans and the New Jersey Association of Health Plans sought technical amendments and emphasized program design issues. Ward Sanders, representing health plans, said proposed committee amendments addressed many technical concerns; he noted that coverage definitions differ across the state health benefits program, Medicaid and commercial plans and asked sponsors to clarify benefit design and interaction with existing school services.
On the committee floor members praised the testimony from young advocates and clinicians. Several members said the bill addresses real gaps in care; one member raised concerns that school systems should improve early identification and services but supported the bill as an important safety net.
The committee approved the motion to amend and release Assembly Bill 5133. The record shows a majority of committee members voting in the affirmative after discussion; one member publicly announced an abstention during the roll call.
Ending: The bill was amended and released from committee; sponsors and staff will reconcile technical amendments related to benefit definitions, provider scope and interaction with school‑based services before further legislative action.
