Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Consent topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Buellton council approves consent calendar; library/field parking‑lot contract pulled for review

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On April 10 the Buellton City Council approved consent calendar items 1–4 (minutes, claims, a COLA resolution and a waterline easement) and agreed to pull item 5 (award of contract for the library/field parking lot) for tabling pending budget discussion and bid‑period checks.

The Buellton City Council on April 10 voted to approve the consent calendar items 1 through 4 and to remove item 5 (the award of contract for the library/field parking‑lot project) from the consent calendar for later consideration.

Items approved on the consent calendar included the minutes from March 27, 2025; the list of claims for payment to date for fiscal year 2024–25; a council resolution approving a 5% cost‑of‑living adjustment for regular full‑time city employees effective July 1, 2025; and acceptance of a public waterline easement for Palm Communities. The staff report identified the COLA as "Resolution number 25‑12" in the consent materials.

Councilmember Sanchez asked to pull item 5, the award of contract for the library/field parking lot project, requesting the item be continued until after the council's Saturday budget discussion. City staff advised the council that the city has up to 45 days after bid opening to act on bids and that postponing consideration to April 24 would keep the city inside that window; with no objections, council pulled item 5 for tabling.

A roll call vote approved consent calendar items 1–4. The minutes show Councilmember Sanchez, Councilmember Hornick and Vice Mayor Alicia Lewis voting aye on the motion to approve items 1–4; the record does not show any no votes or abstentions. There was no formal roll‑call vote recorded for tabling item 5; the council agreed to pull that contract item from the consent calendar by consensus.