Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Testimony splits on Sonia Toma’s nomination to Maui family court; opponents cite conflict of interest
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee took testimony both for and against Sonia Toma’s nomination to the District Family Court of the Second Circuit, with opponents citing her prior role representing Child Protective Services as a conflict of interest.
The Senate Committee on Judiciary heard contested testimony on the nomination of Sonia Toma to the District Family Court of the Second Circuit (Maui County). Opponents told the committee her prior work as a deputy attorney general representing child welfare services raises a conflict of interest for a family court judgeship; supporters, including the Hawaii State Bar Association, said she is qualified and experienced.
Melody Rollnick (testifying in strong opposition) told senators that Toma’s prior role representing Child Protective Services means she would be presiding over the same agency she once advocated for. "That presents a clear conflict of interest and undermines the appearance of judicial neutrality," Rollnick said.
Michelle Lehi, speaking on Zoom, gave detailed testimony about her…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

