Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Mobility Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves developer road agreement; county mobility‑fee credits explained
Summary
Council approved a developer agreement involving mobility‑fee credits tied to widening and right‑of‑way for Hickory Tree/Lake Gentry corridor. County‑approved credits total about $6.84 million; staff said the county will receive most collected fees and the development is in the county JPA area.
The City Council voted 5-0 to approve a developer road agreement (consent item A) that had provoked questions from councilmembers about the size and share of mobility‑fee credits tied to a project in the Lake Gentry/Hickory Tree corridor.
Developer and engineer representatives said the project includes upgrades well beyond what the immediate subdivision requires — building a multi‑lane premium transit corridor segment, feasibility studies and right‑of‑way acquisition stretching beyond the developer’s frontage. The developer’s representative described building roughly three‑quarters of a mile of divided roadway and funding feasibility work, right‑of‑way identification and design intended to accelerate a corridor that primarily benefits the county and broader planning area.
City attorney Joe Thacker and staff noted the parcel and agreements sit in the county’s jurisdiction and as part of a November interlocal agreement all such road agreements are tri‑party: the county has already approved the developer credits and the city’s action aligns the city with that tri‑party approach. City manager and finance staff provided numbers requested by council: the mobility credits in the agreement total $6,839,993.67 and the project is expected to generate about $7,137,673.52 in mobility fees overall. Staff explained the credits are county mobility‑fee credits and that, if the project remains in the county, city mobility fees would not be collected; the city’s share of fees in this case was described in the meeting as approximately 4% but staff clarified the fees will be paid to the county per the approved agreement.
Council discussion focused on transparency, the percentage of fees tied to the developer credits and whether the city should grant large mobility‑fee credits at all. Councilmember Gilbert asked for more information on how mobility‑fee credits are calculated and requested a future workshop to review the city’s approach to fee credits and alternatives. Councilmember Urban and Deputy Mayor Fletcher both said they view developer‑built roadways as an efficient way to get infrastructure in place, but supported additional review. The motion to approve the agreement passed 5‑0.
