Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dual Credit Early College topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bay City ISD to end dual‑credit reimbursement, reassess Early College designation amid budget strain
Summary
District leaders recommended ending a $30,000 dual‑credit reimbursement program and reassessing the Early College High School (ECHS) designation after staff found the district spends more on ECHS and reimbursement than it receives in outcomes bonus funds, creating a recurring shortfall.
Bay City ISD trustees on April 9 heard a program review recommending changes to how the district supports dual credit and its Early College High School (ECHS) program to reduce recurring costs and better target state CCMR (college, career and military readiness) incentives.
District staff reported the district currently budgets $30,000 per year for student dual‑credit reimbursement and spends approximately $105,000 annually on early college programming. Staff said the district received a $61,000 CCMR outcomes bonus last year, leaving a structural shortfall of roughly $74,000 when both programs’ costs are combined.
"The CCMR outcomes bonus is intended to increase the number of students who earn a CCMR point, not to reimburse students who already earned one," staff said. Trustees were told that continuing reimbursements to students who already earn college credit does not further the stated purpose of the outcome bonus and that dual‑credit reimbursements may not be an allowable expense under the allotment rules.
Principal Moser Flores and other staff explained that many of the existing supports created for ECHS—tutoring, TSI testing centers, dual‑credit course sequences and faculty recruitment—have become districtwide capabilities that benefit any student seeking dual credit. Staff recommended honoring commitments to current students who enrolled under prior promises but discontinuing the reimbursement program after the current school year and considering moving away from the formal ECHS designation while preserving dual credit access and campus supports.
Nut graf: The review reflects a shift from subsidizing students already earning college credit toward reallocating limited resources to increase the number of students who can earn CCMR points. The board was advised that removing the ECHS label would not eliminate dual‑credit opportunities but would reduce scheduling constraints, textbook costs and other recurring expenditures tied to the ECHS cohort model.
Trustees asked how changes would affect current applicants and students; staff said they had notified the 31 applicants to the ECHS lottery about the shift and about scholarship application routes through local education foundations. Staff recommended campus‑based approaches that expand dual credit access without the scheduling rigidity and added master‑schedule burdens of a formal ECHS cohort.
Ending: The board received the program review as information; staff will proceed with phasing out the reimbursement program after the current year and return with specifics on transitions, scholarship supports and potential reclassification of the ECHS program.
