Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Development Main Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montpelier reissues RFP for 12–16 Main Street after no proposals; appraisal removed to attract bids
Summary
The council voted to reissue a request for proposals for the city-owned parcel at 12–16 Main Street, removing an asking price and streamlining requirements to encourage developers to submit creative proposals, with housing identified as the city’s top priority.
The Montpelier City Council voted to reissue the RFP for 12–16 Main Street after a prior round drew no proposals.
Josh (economic development specialist, Planning Department) told the council staff removed the appraisal price and trimmed some submission requirements and selection criteria to make it easier for developers to respond. He said the city had discussed height and shape constraints with potential developers and that the lot’s irregular shape makes maximizing units more complicated.
Why it matters: Staff and councilors framed the parcel as an important downtown infill opportunity. Josh presented assessor-based comparables and said a comparable five-story, mixed-use building assessed at about $1.7 million suggested a new-build assessed value on the parcel might be roughly $2 million. He estimated a new-build assessed value in that range would generate roughly $19,000 in municipal taxes and about $30,000 in school taxes annually under current rules.
Council guidance and conditions: Councilors reiterated housing is the top priority for the site and said staff will reject proposals that do not meet community priorities. A number of councilors stressed they will not sign off on taxpayer incentives without a clear public benefit. The council approved sending the revised RFP back to the market by voice vote.
Details and context: Staff noted the zoning allows up to five stories (60-foot height) downtown and that flood elevation and site constraints will affect feasible designs. Jim (councilor) and other members said the city has owned the property for several years and that reissuing the RFP is intended to catalyze development rather than hold the site vacant indefinitely.
Ending: The council approved reissuing the RFP; staff will post the new solicitation and accept proposals for evaluation.
