Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees push to clarify who pays for and manages 3 Belden parking lot; will meet with Parking Authority
Summary
Board members discussed directional signage, striping and management of the recently acquired 3 Belden lot and agreed to follow up with the parking authority and city staff to clarify maintenance and charging arrangements. Trustees said nonprofits leasing space at 3 Belden use the parking the library is currently billed to maintain.
Trustees discussed parking and maintenance responsibilities for the city-owned lot at 3 Belden and agreed to press the Parking Authority and city staff for clarity on who must pay for striping, signage and fence removal.
At the meeting, trustees said the lot was acquired recently (the transcript notes ARPA funds were used for acquisition) and expressed frustration that the library has been charged for striping and other parking maintenance in a lot used by lessees. Trustees named the nonprofits occupying space at 3 Belden as a makerspace, the NAACP and the Chamber of Commerce and said those organizations pay rent to the city while the library has absorbed some parking costs.
Board members described past arrangements in which the Parking Authority managed library lots prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and said that management and gate operations lapsed during the pandemic. Trustees and staff said they will follow up with Parking Authority staff (named contacts in the discussion include Brian and Rocky) and with Jim Travers to request that the Parking Authority resume management and clarify whether striping and signage costs are allocated across departments or uniquely charged to the library.
Trustees also discussed short-term fixes: using rollover funds to remove a fence and address egress issues, and putting up clearer directional signage in the lot that the city recently purchased. They agreed to pursue both near-term repairs from rollover funds and a longer-term redesign of the lot. The board did not take a formal vote; members instructed staff to meet with the Parking Authority and report back.
