Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Contracts Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission authorizes chair and clerk to sign county contracts after staff flags addendums for legal review

2955794 · April 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners authorized the chairman and clerk to enter a county contract discussed as piggybacking on a contract with Phillip/Phillips Jordan; staff asked that council review addendums and certification exhibits before final execution.

The commission authorized the chairman and clerk to enter into a county contract related to engineering/administrative services discussed in the meeting as a piggyback contract tied to a contractor referenced as Philip (Phillip) Jordan. Staff said the county already had a signed contract with Phillips/Philip Jordan but that a new document had addendums (identified in the meeting as an affidavit and exhibits D and F) that county counsel had not yet reviewed.

A staff speaker described the new contract as a piggyback that would allow the county to use the same terms another jurisdiction (Forsyth County) had with the vendor. Staff estimated the contract could generate approximately $50,000 annually through assistance preparing SPLOST/TSPLOST or project submittals and argued the vendor could offset his fee by avoiding engineering overhead costs for the county.

During the discussion a motion was made and seconded authorizing the chairman and county clerk to execute the contract (the motion was described by a commissioner as authorizing signature with Mr. Leavitt). The motion carried in the meeting record. Commissioners asked that county counsel review the added affidavit and certification related to lobbying (exhibit F) before final execution or that staff compare the two contract versions and return if significant differences are found.

Staff said legal review or final comparison would be done prior to or concurrent with the county entering the agreement.