Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sewer District Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on withdrawn $3 million EPA grant for Sewer District; town manager says administration is seeking options
Summary
A resident told the South Berwick Town Council that the Sewer District's $3,000,000 federal grant was withdrawn by the U.S. EPA and asked how the town would respond.
A resident raised concerns at the council's public-comment period after reporting that the Sewer District's $3,000,000 federal grant for pump and septic upgrades had been withdrawn by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The letter, read during public comment, said the district retains a Department of Environmental Protection license (issued in February 2008) but that the district faces new, statewide standards and may need funds to complete required upgrades.
The resident asked whether the town could help the district respond, and whether the withdrawal could expose the district or town to fines or other liabilities. The resident suggested the council and manager work with the district trustees to seek new funding mechanisms or legal remedies.
Town Manager Tim responded that town administration is working with the sewer district and offered the town's assistance. He said he had contacted the school-district administrator and congressional offices, including the office of U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, to identify potential federal earmark or funding avenues and invited the district to request help drafting applications. Tim said the district indicated it was already pursuing some of those avenues.
The manager clarified that the Sewer District is a separate, quasi-municipal entity: it is tax-exempt and provides municipal services, but it is governed by its own board and not directly run by the town. He said the town would monitor the situation and provide support as needed. He also said there was hope the EPA decision could be reversed within weeks but that the town is preparing to assist the district if not.
After the manager's remarks, councilors and members of the public asked clarifying questions about who would bear costs and whether the town would be responsible for the district's obligations. The manager reiterated that the town is not the district's governing body and that any direct financial impacts on district customers would arise through the district's processes, though the town would coordinate where appropriate.
No formal council action was taken during the meeting; the topic was discussed in public comment and by the manager, who offered to include updates in his regular communications if developments occur.
