Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate adopts contentious amendment expanding complaint and investigatory powers in election-related bill
Summary
The Senate adopted a broad, strike-and-insert amendment to a bill about compliance audits of tabulating equipment that adds procedures for election complaints, notification requirements, and investigatory tools such as sworn statements and interrogatories; the amendment passed 17–16 after extended floor debate.
The West Virginia Senate on second reading adopted a contested amendment to the committee substitute for House Bill 3017 (compliance audits of tabulating equipment), inserting additional provisions governing complaints and the investigatory process in alleged election-law violations.
Senators debated a multi-page strike-and-insert amendment that, according to proponents, requires the secretary of state to notify complainants of deficiencies in their complaints, permits corrections, authorizes the state elections commission to determine sufficiency and take action, and authorizes the secretary of state to require sworn statements and responses to interrogatories under penalty of false swearing. The amendment also retained some permissive language and removed prior provisions that would have required the attorney general to seek court enforcement of subpoenas and would have mandated county prosecutors present cases to a grand jury.
The amendment’s sponsor, identified on the floor as the Senator from Brooke, argued the changes were necessary to improve complaint handling and investigations and said the amendment was not a straight copy of an earlier Senate bill. Opponents called the insertion a lengthy, six-page cut-and-paste that required more study; one senator described the move as “disrespectful to leadership” and warned of potential civil- and criminal-law consequences if insufficient procedural safeguards remained.
After extended discussion and points of order on germaneness, the Senate recorded a roll-call machine vote: 17 yays, 16 nays, 1 absent. The presiding officer announced, “I declare the amendment adopted.” The bill was then advanced to third reading.
Why it matters: The amendment adds investigatory and complaint-handling procedures connected to election-law enforcement. Supporters said better-defined complaint processes and correction opportunities will help ensure complaint sufficiency and follow-through. Opponents warned the package expands investigatory authority and may contain due-process and scope concerns that deserve fuller committee study.
Key floor speakers included the Senator from Brooke (amendment sponsor), the Senator from Jefferson (floor opposition), the junior senator from the fifteenth (floor opposition raising procedural and civil-liberties concerns), and the Senator from Summers (floor support). The clerk recorded the 17–16 vote after a sustained floor exchange and the amendment was adopted.
