Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Long Term Care Provider Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee clears framework for provider-rate adjustments, flags $5 basic-care funding for review

2952161 · April 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Appropriations members discussed provider inflation adjustments and whether a $5-per-day basic-care payment should remain in the base budget. Staff presented funding numbers and members asked to move the $5 payment to one-time funds and add a study of rate rebasing for the next session.

The Appropriations — Human Resources Division discussed two interrelated budget matters: inflationary provider-rate adjustments and continuation of a $5-per-day basic-care payment for certain long-term care providers.

Committee staff reported that current budget language leaves $4,067,056 in general funds and $1,474,184 in federal funds (a total of $5,541,240) in the base budget to continue the $5-per-day basic-care payment. Senators debated whether the $5 should remain in the base budget or be treated as one-time funding for the upcoming biennium so the legislature can revisit the policy next session. Committee staff offered a path: subtract ongoing funds and add a one-time line item, and sponsor senators asked staff to draft study language to analyze rebasing of long-term care rates.

On provider inflation adjustments, members discussed a formula referenced in the bill as “2 and 2” and debated numbers including a 2% inflation limit. Committee comments indicated support for a 2% cap on inflationary adjustment in one portion of the bill and a 1.5% figure in another, and senators agreed to carry language forward to conference committee. Staff said they would draft the agreed language and produce study language for a rebasing review.

Committee staff told members they had incorporated most amendments and would give committee members a draft for review before finalizing the bill. With no formal roll-call vote recorded in the transcript, the committee accepted the drafting plan and moved the bill to drafting at the session’s end.

Next steps: staff (Keith and others) will prepare study language and a revised bill draft for committee review and the item will be taken into conference committee as needed.