City restores a 1.5% late fee on Wichita utility bills after council debate

2945749 · March 4, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a lengthy council discussion on cost recovery and customer hardship, Wichita City Council placed a 1.5% late-payment fee back on water, sewer and stormwater bills, rejecting staff's 5% recommendation.

The Wichita City Council voted 4–3 on Tuesday to restore a 1.5% late fee on delinquent utility bills, reversing a recent ordinance change that had removed late-fee authority.

Staff had recommended a 5% charge, arguing a higher late fee would better recover operational costs — including collection and bad‑debt expenses — and incentivize timely payment. Finance and utility staff presented data showing that while a 1.5% fee historically generated roughly $1.2 million a year, the water utility still expensed about $2.4 million annually in uncollected bad debt and roughly $350,000 annually in collection administration costs.

During council debate, several members said they were reluctant to increase the fee beyond an amount that would significantly burden lower‑income households. Opponents of a higher fee noted the fee is eventually borne by all ratepayers if uncollected debt forces higher rates. Supporters of a higher fee said it could reduce delinquencies and the overall burden on the utility.

Council adopted a substitute motion to restore the previous 1.5% late fee and placed the ordinance on first reading. That substitute prevailed 4–3.

Why it matters: The late-fee decision affects how the utility balances customer assistance and cost recovery. City staff runs two assistance programs funded partly by customer donations and a 0.1% water/sewer rate set aside; staff also said outreach to promote assistance options has increased in recent months.

What’s next: The ordinance returns for a second reading before becoming final; staff was directed to continue outreach on assistance programs and maintain existing payment-arrangement guidelines while the council monitors impacts.