Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Plastic Bag Ban topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
One year after ban, Lawrence staff report little measurable drop in plastic-bag problems; more time needed
Summary
City staff and the material-recovery facility reported minimal change in plastic-bag contamination one year after the single-use bag ordinance; managers said household stockpiles and other plastic litter remain and that some park litter has shifted toward food-service items.
City staff and the material-recovery facility that receives Lawrence’s recycling told the Sustainability Advisory Board they have not yet seen a clear, measurable decrease in problematic plastic bags one year after the city’s single-use plastic-bag ordinance took effect.
Kathy Richardson, the city’s sustainability director, summarized contacts with collections staff, the material-recovery facility (MRF) and parks staff. The city’s collection and the MRF reported they have not observed a significant decrease in plastic bags being delivered in recycling or causing equipment contamination. MRF staff said a likely explanation is household stockpiles of bags — residents often saved and continued to use bags acquired before the ban — and the facilities expect to detect a larger impact after those supplies are exhausted.
Parks staff reported mixed observations: anecdotally some staff said they see fewer plastic bags in trees, while others said overall park litter is now more often disposable food-service items (cups, forks, containers) rather than predominantly bags. Richardson also noted that contamination at the compost facility and household-hazardous-waste facility continues to include plastic fragments and “lawn bags” used to transport yard waste or materials to drop-off locations.
Board members asked whether the city could calculate a net-diversion or total-bags-diverted figure for the one-year anniversary; Richardson said some retailers track inventory but no systematic, citywide baseline of bag volumes was gathered pre-ban that would produce a clean before/after number. She offered to request voluntary retailer data to supplement operational observations.
Why it matters: reducing plastic-film contamination in single-stream recycling reduces MRF downtime and equipment damage, and reducing single-use plastic litter is a visible community benefit; staff cautioned that observable change from a ban may take more than one year because of pre-existing household bag stocks and other plastic litter sources.
What’s next: staff will continue monitoring contamination at the MRF, compost and hazardous-waste facilities and will seek voluntary retailer inventory information to help quantify any change over time.
