Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administration Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves permits, personnel actions and meeting minutes; details of votes recorded

2945485 · April 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Des Moines County Board approved a fireworks permit, a temporary liquor license for a wedding, two personnel unpaid-hours actions, and minutes for special and regular meetings; votes were recorded by supervisors on the dais.

At the April 2025 meeting, the Des Moines County Board of Supervisors approved several routine items by voice vote, including a fireworks permit, a temporary liquor license for a wedding event, two personnel unpaid-hours actions and minutes from prior meetings.

Fireworks permit: The board moved and approved a fireworks-permit application for a community display; recorded 'yes' votes were Tom Broker, Shane McCampbell and Jim Carey. The sheriff was not present at the vote and the board noted insurance was in order.

Temporary liquor license: Supervisors approved a temporary liquor license (referred to in the meeting as a "Tipsy Traveler's" license) for a wedding at the Warren on Ridge in April 2025; recorded 'yes' votes were Shane McCampbell, Tom Broker and Jim Carey.

Personnel actions: The board approved two personnel items described as unpaid hours for employees: one totaling 73.3 unpaid hours and a second for part-time correctional officer Peyton Krogemeyer (77.11 unpaid hours). The motion passed with recorded 'yes' votes from Tom Broker, Shane McCampbell and (recorded at the meeting) Jeff/Jim Carey.

Minutes and reports: The board approved minutes for a special meeting (08/01/2025) and regular minutes for April 2025 and received the March 2025 report to be filed in the auditor’s office for public viewing.

Each motion was seconded (a county official said "Second. Sarah" in those instances); the record shows unanimous recorded yes votes by the three supervisors present. The meeting record did not specify individual motion movers in the transcript; recorded votes on each approval were taken by roll-call-style prompts and answered 'yes' by the listed supervisors.

No substantive policy changes, contract awards, or budget adoptions were made in these items; approvals were routine and procedural.