Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Remote Committee Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rules committee moves to adopt Rule 9(a) standards for remote committee participation
Summary
Committee members debated a motion to apply Rule 9(a) floor standards to remote committee meetings and to allow chairs discretion on remote participation; the transcript does not record a final vote outcome.
The Senate Rules Committee considered a motion to approve committee meetings "pursuant to the requirements of Rule 9(a) along with participation as determined appropriately by the chair," the Senate secretary said, and members discussed how that standard would apply to remote participation.
The proposal would extend the Rule 9(a) floor requirements — including on-camera voting and audio presence — to committee meetings that permit remote participation, while preserving each committee chair's discretion to allow or deny remote participation. The committee discussed whether a remote participant could count toward a quorum under a state of emergency.
The Senate secretary explained that under Rule 9(a) "you could all be remote" during a state of emergency and that, if the chair permits remote participation, remote members would "count for the quorum" and their votes would be counted. Committee members asked for clarification about whether a quorum must be physically present; the secretary said that the chair may require in-person attendance but must apply that rule equally.
A motion to adopt the proposed implementation was made in the meeting. The motion language presented to the committee was: "The Senate Rules Committee approves committee meetings pursuant to the requirements of Rule 9(a) along with participation as determined appropriately by the chair." The transcript records the motion being made and discussion about quorum and chair discretion but does not record a final vote tally or explicit approval on the record.
Because the transcript does not show a recorded vote or formal adoption at that meeting, it is not possible from the record to say whether the motion was approved or tabled.
The discussion underscores how the committee is seeking to balance transparency safeguards (such as visible voting and audible participation) with operational flexibility for remote attendance during public-health emergencies. No additional implementation deadlines or reporting requirements were specified in the recorded discussion.
