Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Select Board delays town‑meeting warrant after lengthy debate over sewer easement language and DEP appeal
Summary
Discussion over Article 7 — a proposed surplus/easement for a sewer project — and an outstanding DEP appeal prompted the Select Board to table the annual town meeting warrant and ask staff for clarified language, legal review and a valuation plan before proceeding.
The Select Board engaged in an extended discussion about Article 7 of the draft annual town meeting warrant, a proposed action related to surplusing a 20‑foot easement across town‑owned land at or near 381 Baldwinville Road to allow a developer to install a low‑pressure sewer main.
Speakers at the meeting raised process and sequencing concerns. Several members of the public and board said DEP has an outstanding appeal about wetlands work connected to the project and that conservation and sewer commissions have reviewed aspects of the proposal. Ron Avon — speaking as a neighborhood resident and proponent of more information — said the article before the board is to establish whether the town will consider declaring the easement surplus and whether the town would commission a valuation prior to any transfer. He explained the developer may decide not to proceed if an appraisal shows the easement’s value is too costly.
Board members and members of the public pressed for clarity on who submitted the article (developer vs. Select Board) and whether the Conservation Commission and Sewer Commission had been consulted. Conservation Agent Jessica Case and others told the board ConCom had not been included in drafting the article and explained a superseding order of conditions filed with DEP could change which body controls final approvals. Members of the public urged waiting for the DEP determination before proceeding.
After extended back‑and‑forth the Select Board voted to table the annual town meeting warrant and return on April 23 with clarified article language and supporting documents: (1) a legal memo on surplus/transfer of town land and the process for a valuation/appraisal; (2) confirmation whether the proposed easement is considered surplus; (3) written documentation of who submitted the article; and (4) any outstanding DEP or permitting determinations.
Why this matters Article 7 could change ownership or rights associated with town property and enable a utility installation that would alter wetlands and hydrology. The board’s decision to delay reflects concerns that a town meeting vote without DEP resolution or a clear appraisal could lead to wasted expense or contested outcomes.
What’s next Staff and counsel will produce a clarified warrant article and legal memorandum for the board’s April 23 meeting. If the DEP appeal resolves in favor of the developer, the board and town meeting will still need an appraisal and clear terms for surplus/easement conveyance before construction can proceed.
