Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Independence Middle School work continues; district grapples with schedule recovery and change orders for new elementary project
Summary
Construction teams told the Bethel Park School District board April 8 that Phase 3 work at Independence Middle School will run behind schedule by weeks but remains on an overarching recovery plan; the new elementary school project has ongoing change orders and a remaining contingency roughly around $1.1 million.
Get email alerts on the Construction Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Contractors and district construction staff updated the Bethel Park School District Board of School Directors on April 8 about progress and schedule risk on two major projects: Phase 3 work at Independence Middle School (IMS) and the new elementary school construction.
At IMS, the contractor said crews discovered tile and drywall issues in the lower level that required removing and redoing corridor tile and associated drywall, producing an expected multi‑week delay for turning over the lower level spaces. "We are gonna be a couple weeks late turning over, downstairs," the SiteLogic representative said, adding that the auditorium work and other areas are progressing and that the district still expects to occupy areas in August despite localized delays.
On the new elementary school, the construction manager said the project is in a schedule recovery mode after earlier delays tied to pyrite remediation and other site work. He described a mix of gains and remaining work and said the team has reclaimed roughly eight weeks through sequencing changes but gave a guarded near‑term projection: "I can't tell you right now, we're looking at, like, October date. We are in recovery mode."
Budget and change orders
Finance and construction staff reviewed change orders and the aggregate change order summary in the board packet. A board question about totals produced these figures during the meeting: the projected total change amount shown on the packet was approximately $2,100,000 (including that night's changes), and the staff reply said the remaining contingency or unspent portion cited in discussion was roughly $1,100,000.
Board members also asked about specific additional scope changes. A contractor described an omitted mechanical/HVAC item in design documents and confirmed it had not been included in the original bid: "They were omitted from the design," he said. The meeting included discussion of a bundled nurse‑suite revision ASI and separate mechanical/electrical ASIs.
Schedule, testing and phasing
Contractors emphasized that interior sequencing was being adjusted to minimize disruption to testing and school operations; for example, music department moves were scheduled to allow finishing one area while another is used during the year. The site team reported more than 60 workers on site at peak and said upcoming milestones include continued mechanical rough‑ins, steel erection for upper levels, and placing roof sections in the near term.
What was decided
No formal contract closeout or final acceptance actions were recorded at the meeting. The board and staff agreed to continue weekly schedule reviews and to present necessary change orders and payment requests in committee and consent‑agenda items for future board action.
Ending
District staff framed the next steps as schedule recovery and additional cost monitoring: contractors will continue weekly meetings with district staff to finalize the recovery schedule and return to the board with any required approvals for change orders or payments.

