Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate consent agenda process; several items pulled for department presentation
Summary
Board discussed moving routine items to consent and methods for highlighting important work; commissioners agreed to move items 3, 4, 5, 7, 16, 17, 18 and 19 off consent for the April 15 meeting or to have staff briefly present while leaving items on consent.
Thurston County commissioners spent an extended portion of their agenda-setting meeting debating how the board should handle the consent calendar and whether more items that highlight substantive county work should stay on consent or be elevated to department items for public visibility.
Commissioner Emily Clouse said she wants “to highlight the really important work that our staff is doing” and asked to move several items off the consent list so they receive public attention at the business meeting rather than simply being approved as a block. County managers and the clerk proposed a hybrid approach: leave routine items on consent but allow staff brief presentations immediately before the consent vote for items commissioners want highlighted, or move selected items to department items when a separate vote or fuller discussion is needed.
After discussion, the board agreed for the April 15 agenda to treat items 3 (NPPGov cooperative membership), 4 (set public hearing on surplus property ordinance), 5 (Motorola radios sole-source purchase), 7 (Commute Trip Reduction plan update), 16 (school resource officer contract with North Thurston), 17 (DOC reimbursement for narcotics task force overtime), 18 (SWAT/medic interlocal agreements), and 19 (single-source grappler purchase) as items that will either be pulled from consent for department presentation or moved to department items until the board finalizes the new process. Commissioner Clouse specifically asked that items 3 and 4 be pulled and later said she would also pull item 5; Chair pro tem Wayne Fournier and other commissioners agreed to coordinate the approach.
Staff described a procedure to keep the expedited consent process while allowing short staff presentations for items flagged by commissioners so they remain in the consent block but still receive public visibility. The board also agreed to return to work-session-level discussion to finalize a long-term approach to balancing staff time and public transparency.
No formal votes were recorded at the agenda-setting meeting on the consent-policy changes; the actions recorded were procedural directions to staff and a working list of items the board flagged for extra attention at the April 15 meeting.
