Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Control Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alpine group approves streamlined animal ordinance language after public comment on county rules and shelter needs

2938266 · April 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members approved recommended changes to multiple animal-control ordinance sections and heard a public comment from a longtime shelter operator urging county-level ordinances and a brick-and-mortar facility.

Members approved recommended edits to local animal-control ordinance language and heard from a shelter operator who urged pursuing county ordinances and permanent shelter space. The committee motion to adopt the edits passed on a voice vote after discussion.

The vote followed public comment from Della Vincent, who identified herself as the operator of a local animal shelter run from her home. Vincent said she has operated rescue work for roughly 29 years and ran the county shelter beginning in 2017, and asked whether city ordinance language (for issues such as dangerous or nuisance dogs, leash rules and limits on backyard breeding) could be adapted into county ordinances for Marathon and other unincorporated places. "I didn't know if I could do that or not," Vincent said, and asked to sit in on meetings to learn the process.

The committee discussed how county ordinances would require approval by county commissioners and noted that unincorporated places sometimes rely primarily on state law. Members suggested starting in Marathon as a pilot if broader county action proved difficult.

On the ordinance edits, the committee reviewed a set of redline changes to sections identified during the meeting as 10-49, 10-50 and 10-52. The revisions, as described by a committee speaker, replace multiple references to "dog and cat" with the broader term "animal," rename local enforcement references to "Alpine Animal Services" in some places, condense lengthy paragraphs about removal and disposition of deceased animals, and remove or rework an older, long paragraph in section 10-52. A committee member summarized the edits as making the code "simpler" and more concise.

A motion to approve the recommended ordinance language was made and seconded; the committee voted "aye" and the motion carried. Earlier in the meeting the committee also voted to approve the minutes of the previous meeting by voice vote.

Speakers and participants at the meeting suggested fundraising and donor-recognition ideas — including memorial benches and a mural with named leaves — as potential revenue for expanded services. Vincent said she is seeking land to move the shelter out of her home into a brick-and-mortar facility and plans to pursue grants if land becomes available.

No formal ordinance was adopted at the meeting date beyond the committee vote to approve the group's recommended edits; the transcript records the committee-level approval but does not show subsequent county- or council-level enactment within this meeting.

The committee closed with standard board-member comments and adjournment.