Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parks planning tied to development‑impact fee study as commission ranks short‑term projects
Summary
The Sandpoint Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed staff’s preliminary ranking of parks capital projects on March 9 and learned the list will feed an ongoing development impact fee study intended to help pay for future park improvements.
The Sandpoint Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed staff’s preliminary ranking of parks capital projects and a short stakeholder survey on March 9, and staff said the results will be used to finalize a capital improvement plan (CIP) that feeds an ongoing development impact fee study.
Staff said the park master plan adopted in 2020 provided the baseline for project selection and that the city has instructed staff to prioritize maintenance and critical infrastructure as well as pursue revenue‑generating projects where feasible. The city’s consultant updating development impact fees will use the CIP to set justifications and approximate costs for park projects that can be charged to future growth under Idaho law; staff told the commission the consultant expects total park‑related capital needs of roughly $7.5 million over the next 10 years under current level‑of‑service assumptions.
At the meeting staff described three short‑term (0–2 year) priorities that rose to the top of the survey results: a Traverse picnic shelter (Rotary has contributed seed funds), a skate‑park shade structure (fundraising by the Bonner County Skate Park Association), and a dog‑park feasibility study (local donors have begun designated contributions). Staff said many proposed projects will require site planning, engineering and public outreach before construction and that some planning work will be done in‑house while larger projects will require consultants and grant or donor funding.
Staff outlined that the development impact fee update covers multiple service areas (streets, pathways, parks, police, fire) and that parks staff are providing project lists and rough cost estimates to the consultant; those estimates will be refined and attached to fee calculations. Commissioners discussed the value of amending the 2020 master plan to reflect current financial realities and priorities; staff said an appendix or formal amendment to the master plan would be a reasonable approach and that the final CIP will be delivered to the consultant in the coming weeks.
Staff also reported specific maintenance and small projects planned in‑house: City Beach swing replacement with a new ADA access trail (using refurbished swings from Traverse), volleyball court additions funded by a local volleyball group, asphalt trail repairs at multiple parks and a downtown adopt‑a‑planter program. Staff asked for additional commissioner feedback and said grant decisions pending for parking‑lot paving and other projects could shift priorities if they are awarded.
No formal vote occurred to change the master plan at the meeting; staff asked commissioners to email any further comments and indicated they will assign estimated costs to each CIP item and circulate the final list to the commission.
