Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate rejects amendment to change makeup of proposed prosecutor review board after extended floor debate
Summary
Senators debated whether the proposed prosecutor review board should be structured 4–1 or 3–2 by party representation. An amendment to restore a 3–2 balance failed on a roll call, 15–34. The bill remained ordered to engrossment.
Senators on the Indiana Senate floor debated an amendment to a bill establishing a prosecutor review board, ultimately rejecting a change that would have restored a 3–2 partisan balance. The amendment failed on a roll call, 15 ayes to 34 noes; the bill was ordered to engrossment.
Supporters of the amendment, led from the floor by Senator Poll, said they sought to preserve the balance that came from the House. “What amendment number 1 does is returns the bill to the original state that it was in when it came to us, from the house,” Poll said, arguing the change would prevent a dominant majority from overwhelming the review process. Poll urged colleagues that a 3–2 composition would encourage members to “look our own parties in the eye and say, this is just wrong.”
Opponents, including Senator Freeman, argued that the amendment would be impractical given current party distribution among elected prosecutors. “Not everybody is engaged with IPAC. … 82 or so prosecutors in Indiana are Republican, currently. Of the 91, and there are 91 prosecutors, not 92,” Freeman said, adding that requiring a 3–2 split could make staffing the board difficult in practice.
Other senators pressed on statutory details and implementation. Senator Taylor clarified the appointing authority: “The prosecuting attorney council would create this board. … This would be a new board. It doesn't matter who's on the Prosecutor Attorney's Council board. They could appoint any member from the 90 with amongst the 91, prosecutors in the state of Indiana.” Senator Glick directed attention to bill text on appointments, saying, “Page 4, lines 9 through 13. The board of directors, the prosecuting attorneys council of Indiana shall appoint 5 members of the board. These 5 members must also be members of the board of directors, the Prosecuting Attorney's Council of Indiana.”
After floor debate and questioning about how appointments would be made and whether the council could be dominated by a single party, the Senate voted on the amendment to restore the 3–2 makeup; the amendment failed, 15 ayes to 34 noes. The clerk then recorded that the bill was ordered to engrossment.
The debate highlighted tensions over partisan balance, local elections (the relative partisan makeup of county prosecutors), and whether an appointed review body should reflect political diversity or the present partisan distribution among elected prosecutors. No further amendments were adopted on the floor during the period covered by the transcript.
The bill will proceed in the legislative process with the amendment rejected; further committee or floor action could follow as the bill moves toward final passage or additional consideration.
