Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appellate panel hears claim that flawed self-defense instruction and inadequate defense investigation require new trial in Commonwealth v. Sabu

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In Commonwealth v. Sabu (24P652), defense counsel argued the trial judge’s self-defense jury instruction lowered the Commonwealth’s burden and that defense counsel failed to investigate an alleged victim’s criminal record; the Commonwealth defended the instruction and emphasized the video evidence that the appellant was the initial aggressor.

Nick Madison, arguing for the defendant in Commonwealth v. Sabu (24P652), told the court that two errors required a new trial: (1) a self-defense instruction that, in his view, conditioned the Commonwealth’s burden on the jury making certain findings and thus improperly lowered the standard, and (2) counsel’s failure to obtain the criminal history and other investigative material relating to an alleged…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans