Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsor pulls library bill for further study after questions about enforcement and costs
Summary
Representative Bentley pulled House Bill 19‑77 for interim study after committee members raised questions about the civil cause of action, who would be liable and potential costs to school districts and public libraries.
Get email alerts on the Library Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Bentley introduced House Bill 19‑77, a narrowly written proposal to give parents and others a civil cause of action if sexually explicit material appears in taxpayer‑funded library collections available to children.
Bentley framed the proposal as narrowly focused on materials that "show explicit sexual activity" in areas accessible to children; she said she had worked with counsel and the Attorney General's office and that some librarians supported the narrow language. Committee members asked detailed questions about the civil remedy and who would be named in a lawsuit — individual librarians, the public library or the school district — and about the potential fiscal exposure for local districts if suits were filed.
Representative Painter suggested narrowing the bill to public (municipal/county) libraries rather than school libraries, noting a related bill earlier in the session moved school library materials into a supervised or lockbox arrangement. Several members urged the sponsor to consult with Representative McGrew and with school districts; Representative Bentley said she would pull the bill and request an interim study so authors and counsel could work through definitions, enforcement and fiscal impacts.
The committee did not take a final vote on HB 19‑77; the sponsor signaled intent to pursue further work in an interim study.
