Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oil And Gas Net Proceeds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee votes to clarify "net proceeds" in oil and gas statute after heated debate over royalty payments
Summary
After extensive testimony from royalty owners, oil and gas attorneys and industry representatives, the committee voted to pass House Bill 16‑56, which defines "net proceeds" for gas royalty calculations; supporters said it restores longstanding practice, opponents warned of constitutional and retroactivity concerns.
Senator Brianne Davis introduced House Bill 16‑56 as a measure to define the statutory term "net proceeds" in Arkansas Code Annotated §15‑72‑305, a definition backers said is necessary to reduce litigation and restore consistency in royalty payments.
Mark Robinette, an oil and gas attorney and adjunct professor, told the committee the bill would define net proceeds differently for two categories of leases: integrated units (where the Oil and Gas Commission retains authority to allow certain deductions) and private lease interests, where the bill would return net proceeds to the gross proceeds minus only lease‑permitted deductions. "We're going to put a definition on net proceeds," Robinette said, adding the bill "clarifies an ambiguous statutory term going forward so everybody understands and plays by the same rules."
Opponents, including attorneys with long industry experience, argued the statute passed in 1985 was incorporated into existing leases and that changing the statutory interpretation would impair those contracts and be unconstitutional as to preexisting leases. Alan Perkins and Jim Rankin of PPGMR urged caution and said retroactive application to existing contracts would raise serious legal issues.
Royalty owners and local officials described economic effects in Fayetteville Shale counties. Rick Paloma, a registered landman and mineral owner, said some royalty owners were reluctant to lease while the interpretation was unsettled; others showed documents indicating the practical reduction in payments under the newer interpretation. Senator Jonathan Dismang displayed payment stubs comparing checks under prior practice and recent payments to illustrate the effect.
The Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission representative said the issue split along two lines: integrated unit payments and private lease computations; the commission previously defended an interpretation for integrated parties in state proceedings. The commission also noted it stops enforcement if a royalty payment dispute is in active litigation.
After extended questions and rebuttals, sponsor Senator Davis asked the committee to move the bill to the Senate floor for a fuller debate. The committee voted in favor and the chair announced the bill passes out of committee for further consideration.
