Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: council approves multiple appropriations and waives readings
Summary
At its April 7 meeting, Newark City Council approved several appropriations and related resolutions by unanimous roll call; the council also waived a two-day renewal on one resolution and referred some items to future meetings.
Newark City Council used roll-call votes on a group of routine appropriations and procedural items at the April 7 meeting. Several measures passed unanimously with little floor discussion; council members handled other items by holding them for future meetings or waiving the usual waiting period.
Key votes and outcomes:
- Resolution 25‑12 (appropriating monies for current municipal expenses) — Motion by Mr. Schick; second by Mr. Wilboudis. Passed 9–0 on roll call.
- Resolution 25‑13 (appropriating monies for current municipal expenses) — Motion by Mr. Marmey; second by Mr. Parker. Passed 9–0 on roll call.
- Resolution 25‑16 (appropriating monies for current municipal expenses) — Council moved to waive the two-day renewal and then adopted the resolution. The waiver motion (Marmey, second Barker) passed; adoption (Marley, second Parker) passed on roll call, 9–0.
- Several other appropriation resolutions (25‑17, 25‑18 and others noted on the agenda) were held until the next meeting, April 21, or otherwise continued for later consideration.
Roll calls on the items that passed showed unanimous "yes" votes by the attending nine council members; the transcript records each name as voting "yes." Where a mover and seconder were recorded, they are listed above. For items held, the council either announced a future meeting date for further consideration or stated the item would be taken up at the next regular meeting.
The council's certification of these appropriations will allow the city to continue regular operations and commitments covered by the municipal budget lines cited in the resolution texts; specific appropriation amounts were not read into the public record during the meeting.
