Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sanctuary Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hundreds urge San Fernando to become sanctuary city; council declines to direct staff to draft ordinance

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dozens of residents and several advocacy groups called on the San Fernando City Council to adopt a sanctuary policy to restrict local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Councilmembers debated legal scope and local risk and voted down a motion to direct staff to draft a formal ordinance.

Dozens of residents and representatives from immigrant-rights groups urged the San Fernando City Council on May 7 to adopt a sanctuary policy that would limit local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

The call for a formal policy dominated public comment, with speakers including Brandon Gonzalez, who said he was representing State Senator Caroline Mendeavor and urged the council: “I once again strongly ask the city council to support designating the city of San Fernando as a sanctuary city.” Maria Flores, a community member, told the council: “I am here to voice my strong support for making San Fernando a sanctuary city.”

Supporters framed the measure as a public-safety and family-stability step. Joanna Reyes, district director for Assemblywoman Celeste Rodriguez, said her office backs a local policy and described state-level efforts to help families prepare for immigration detention. Lawyers and service providers also addressed the council: Jana Whaley of Public Counsel said a sanctuary policy “will ensure that the city's resources are dedicated to meeting local needs rather than carrying out federal immigration enforcement.”

Council debate focused on what new local language would add to California law and whether a local label would increase legal or political exposure. Several speakers and staff referenced Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act. Police Chief Fabian Valdez noted legal obligations on local law enforcement and said the department will follow state requirements: “It is my duty to ensure that we comply with state law ... the policy of the San Fernando Police Department is we will adhere to the California Values Act and all its mandates.”

Mayor Mary Mendoza said she supports immigrant residents but opposed adopting a local designation at this time, saying, “I cannot support designation at this time,” and citing concern that a local declaration could draw federal attention and possibly increase risk to residents.

Councilmember Patty Lopez moved to direct staff to draft an "immigrant protections" policy that would: prohibit use of city property by immigration authorities without a judicial warrant; prohibit city personnel from providing access to city data about immigration status without judicial process; and prohibit city personnel from collecting immigration status information unless required by law. The motion was seconded and put to roll call. The council vote was: Patty Lopez — yes; Victoria Garcia — no; Joe Fajardo — no; Vice Mayor Mary Salorio — yes; Mayor Mary Mendoza — no. The motion failed 2–3.

After the vote, several council members and community leaders said they would pursue other ways to reassure residents. Council members and staff described ongoing steps the city has already taken, including a written San Fernando Police Department policy that limits cooperation with federal immigration holds and the city manager’s plan to provide know-your-rights materials and legal resources for residents.

The council did not adopt a new ordinance or direct staff to draft a final local policy on May 7. Councilmembers who opposed the motion said they wanted more study and a careful drafting process; supporters said they would continue advocating for a local measure in coming meetings.

Local and state advocates said they will keep pushing for a formal measure and urged the council to prioritize clear, written protections so residents feel safe reporting crimes and seeking city services.

Council action on immigration policy remains open; staff and councilmembers signaled further outreach and possible follow-up drafts in future agendas.