Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Access And Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and developers urge committee to protect DCR access and add egress for Columbia Point as UMass project advances
Summary
Harbor Point residents, developers and officials testified in support of bills seeking to protect DCR access and require improved egress for the Columbia Point peninsula amid large-scale development proposals.
Residents of Harbor Point, developers and local officials urged the joint committee to act on legislation intended to protect public access to Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) land along Dorchester Bay and to address traffic and emergency-access concerns tied to large private development proposals on Columbia Point.
Orlando Perella, chairman of the Harbor Point Community Task Force, told the committee that Harbor Point’s roughly 3,500 residents (about 1,289 housing units, including roughly 400 subsidized units) need an additional access/egress connection from the peninsula to Day Boulevard to avoid gridlock and to ensure emergency vehicles can reach residents during peak traffic. Perella asked for legislation or agency action to require planners and developers to provide an additional route and said the UMass Building Authority (UMBA) has not responded adequately to residents’ requests.
Senator Collins said the committee should seek legal clarity—potentially an opinion from the Supreme Judicial Court—about Article 97 protections for parkland and whether easements and access over paved park property should be treated differently from grassy open space. Collins and other speakers criticized how the UMass Building Authority had handled prior community commitments and said prior legislative relief granting UMBA a nonexclusive easement had had unintended consequences for neighboring property owners and public access.
Developers and community leaders described the planned Dorchester Bay City development as very large (speakers referenced proposals in the multiple-million-square-foot range; one estimate cited “over 6,000,000 square feet”) and warned that current circulation and egress for the peninsula are inadequate. Several witnesses urged statutory protections to preserve public access and to ensure UMBA and other public entities coordinate with DCR and local communities.
No committee vote was recorded at the hearing; witnesses asked the committee to move legislation that would clarify public access rights and protect DCR easements and parkland.
