Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Nebraska debate over returning to winner‑take‑all electoral votes ends with failed cloture; no final vote
Summary
After four hours of floor debate on LB3 — a proposal to end Nebraska’s district‑based allocation of presidential electors and move to a statewide winner‑take‑all system — a motion to invoke cloture failed 31–18, leaving the measure without a final decision and prompting continued discussion about a possible ballot or constitutional route.
Senators on the Nebraska Legislature spent more than four hours Monday debating Legislative Bill 3, which would repeal Nebraska’s district‑based allocation of presidential electors and return the state to a statewide winner‑take‑all method. A motion by sponsor Senator Lippincott to invoke cloture and end debate failed on a roll call, 31–18, and the body took no final vote on the bill.
The bill would change how Nebraska’s five electoral votes are awarded in presidential elections. "The United States Electoral College plays a crucial role in ensuring that every citizen's vote is equal in the election of the president of The United States," Senator Lippincott said in his opening remarks, arguing Nebraska should "return to [a] winner take all system" to align with 48 other states. He called the district plan "a miserable experiment" and said the switch would restore national consistency.
Opponents said the current system gives smaller populations and distinct…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
