District tech staff recommend enterprise SchoolAI subscription after privacy vetting

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District technology and curriculum staff reported multi‑month vetting of AI tools and recommended an enterprise subscription to SchoolAI; staff said SchoolAI met privacy and data‑handling requirements and would be used for both teacher and student applications with controls.

Mill Creek Township School District technology and curriculum staff on April 7 recommended beginning an enterprise subscription with SchoolAI after a multi‑month vetting process and moved the recommendation to the school board for final approval as part of the Instruction committee’s set of action items.

Presenters described a formal review of multiple artificial‑intelligence products, checking for compliance with privacy standards and secure data handling. One staff member said the district developed a list of vetting questions and raised concerns about an alternative product that, on review, indicated data‑sale language in its terms — a red flag. The presenter said SchoolAI “checked the boxes” on required privacy safeguards and that the vendor explained what data is retained and how session data is removed.

Technology staff explained the district already blocks many AI websites on school devices and is working with web‑filter vendor LineWise to block AI categories at the network level; the staff member noted the district cannot block students’ home devices. “This LineWise is working with us because they are categorizing AI as a category, and so we are working with LineWise to be able to block everything for students and then only have the ones that are available for students that we want,” the staff member said.

Staff described a cautious rollout: most vendor tools are authorized for teacher use only, with some student‑facing features where contract terms and privacy allow. The presenters said SchoolAI would provide an enterprise platform that supports classroom usage while meeting the district’s data‑security expectations and that part of next year’s technology professional development will focus on training teachers how to use vetted AI tools safely.

The Instruction committee approved forwarding item 3.02, the SchoolAI purchase, to the April board meeting as part of a grouped motion that included items 3.01–3.06. The committee’s minutes record the motion to forward the items and indicate a voice vote carried the motion; no roll‑call vote was recorded in the committee minutes.

Staff said the district’s licensing plan includes per‑student seats (teachers retain access for lesson development even where students do not have devices) so pre‑K teachers can use SchoolAI to create materials, translations and parent communications even if pre‑K students are not individually logged in.

Presenters referenced federal and state privacy frameworks in general terms and the district’s existing use of COPPA/FERPA as baseline protections; they told the committee they will continue to secure specific contractual language on data retention and deletion before final procurement.