Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident criticizes city oversight after developer cuts trees at Duke and Lee/Emma’s Landing site
Summary
During public comment, a resident said trees were removed at the Duke and Lee/Emma’s Landing site and criticized city oversight and communication with the developer MIF. The remarks were made in the context of an Arbor Day proclamation read earlier in the meeting.
A resident used the council’s public-comment period on April 7 to criticize city oversight and to link the criticism to an Arbor Day proclamation presented earlier in the meeting.
The commenter said they had received an email about the Duke and Lee property and criticism of Emma’s Landing management and asked if there was someone they could speak with about the property’s status. The resident then read the Arbor Day proclamation language (which names Kevin Burns, mayor of the city of Geneva, as the proclaimer) and said the proclamation’s call to protect trees stood in contrast to recent events at the Duke and Lee site.
The resident alleged that trees identified as “witness trees” had been removed from adjoining city land several years earlier and called that the result of “ineffectual oversight by the city.” The speaker said the developer cut trees down and then sought annexation, and said the developer’s marketing of the property on the city website showed it had little interest in “being a good neighbor.” The resident said they had asked only for “a conversation with MIF about the possibility of relocating one building to save trees” and criticized council members who, the speaker said, had “vilified” residents for raising such concerns.
The commenter also said they were told by “Karim Purag” that Mayor Kevin Burns had relayed developer concerns about rudeness in public communications and urged tone adjustments; the resident used that exchange to argue the city had not adequately pursued a collaborative approach to preserve trees. The resident concluded by saying that the Arbor Day proclamation “isn’t worth the paper that it’s written on” unless the city changes how it handles such matters.
Ending The remarks were part of public comment; no formal response from council staff or the mayor is recorded in the meeting excerpt included here. City staff later made a phone number available for a separate resident (Chris Paikin) who asked earlier in public comment about the Duke and Lee property.
