Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks Walkability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Coy minor subdivision; grants exception to sidewalk frontage improvement
Summary
The commission approved a two‑lot split in Upper Humboldt Hill and granted the applicant an exception to a standard sidewalk/landscaping frontage requirement, citing neighborhood context and terrain; the decision drew mixed commissioner views and a recommendation to consider a neighborhood walkability study.
The Planning Commission approved the Coy Minor Subdivision in the Humboldt Hill area and granted the applicant’s exception request to the county’s standard requirement to install a sidewalk landscaping strip across the property frontage.
Planner Steve Lazar presented the staff report and explained the basic project: a lot split that separates a single‑family home and an accessory dwelling unit into two separate parcels in a subdivision originally approved in the 1950s. Lazar noted most of the subdivision is within an urbanized area and that under SB 9 ministerial lot‑split provisions some parcels could be eligible for ministerial splits, but this applicant requested an exception to frontage improvement requirements tied to the subdivision.
“Public Works has been consistent historically to require sidewalks wherever the conditions are met to be an urbanized environment,” Lazar told commissioners, but he also outlined circumstances that staff judged made the exception supportable in this case: the fragmented pattern of sidewalk installation in the neighborhood, steep grades along Skyline Drive that would make sidewalk installation impractical, mature vegetation and retaining walls that could be disturbed by a sidewalk alignment, and the long history of piecemeal development in the area.
Applicant representatives and the property owner John Coy spoke to those site constraints, saying sidewalk construction would remove mature shrubs and a retaining wall, require relocation of drainage inlets and be impractical on steep sections of Skyline Drive adjacent to the lot. “We would lose all of that. All that would be torn out,” Coy said of the vegetation and wall along the parcel frontage.
Several commissioners voiced differing perspectives. Some said the county’s general practice has been to require sidewalks as a public‑safety and connectivity improvement and favored a more consistent neighborhood approach; others said the site’s terrain and the age of the subdivision justified the exception and welcomed staff’s compromise. One commissioner suggested Public Works consider a neighborhood walkability plan if funding becomes available.
The commission voted in favor of the proposed minor subdivision and granted the exception to frontage improvements for this lot; the motion included staff’s recommended conditions of approval. The roll call recorded a majority in favor with two commissioners voting no; the motion carried.
Staff and commissioners asked Public Works to consider a broader walkability or pathway plan for the older Humboldt Hill subdivisions in the future; the commission did not impose additional neighborhood‑level requirements as part of this approval.
