Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Council reviews real-estate conveyance and fair-share fees; affordable housing allocation to be revisited

January 06, 2025 | South Kingstown, Washington County, Rhode Island


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council reviews real-estate conveyance and fair-share fees; affordable housing allocation to be revisited
Finance Director Brian Sylvia reviewed fees that support open space, affordable housing and village infrastructure and explained the council's prior, one-year decision to apply a share of real-estate conveyance revenue to the affordable housing fund.

Sylvia said the audited fund balances as of June 30, 2024 were: open space about $1,441,030; affordable housing about $183,891; and village infrastructure about $38,009. He explained that the council last year redirected a portion of conveyance fees for one year to cover open-space debt service and to boost funding for affordable housing; that allocation was due to be revisited.

Why it matters: The real-estate conveyance fee and the fair-share development fees are locally controlled revenue streams that town leaders use to finance open-space acquisition, affordable-housing programs and village improvements. Council members asked whether the one-year change could be extended to avoid an annual rehearing. One councilmember suggested a nonbinding vote and then including the direction in the final CIP adoption.

Details: Sylvia gave numerical examples: of a typical $600,000 conveyance-year projection, $166,000 would go to the general fund, $208,000 to open-space debt service, and $226,000 to affordable housing in the current-year allocation. He said that once certain open-space debt service obligations end in FY 2026-27, the funds available for affordable housing would increase materially.

Next steps: Council members asked staff to include an alternate CIP slide showing a multi-year allocation that would maintain higher affordable-housing funding after open-space debt obligations expire. Staff were asked to consult the town solicitor and to bring a recommended approach for the final CIP adoption.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee