Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeland Defense Cartels topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SOCOM: FTO designation of cartels does not change authorities; command preparing options for homeland defense
Summary
Witnesses told the subcommittee that designating Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations does not by itself grant new military authorities, but SOCOM has elevated planning with U.S. Northern Command and Special Operations Command North and stands ready to provide options to the president.
Lawmakers asked whether the administration’s designation of some Mexican drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) changed SOCOM authorities or prompt planning for operations in Mexico.
Colby Jenkins said the FTO designation “does not grant us any new authorities,” but he said the designation “unlocks our ability to work better with our whole‑of‑government approach,” particularly in areas such as counter‑threat finance and information sharing with law enforcement. Jenkins added that the designation reinforces the view that border security is national security.
Gen. Brian Fenton echoed that the designation did not create new military authorities but said SOCOM has reprioritized efforts and increased support to Special Operations Command North (SOCNORTH) and U.S. Northern Command to develop plans and assessment products requested by the department. Fenton said SOCOM “will be ready to defend and provide options to the president” should the president choose military action.
Representative Jacobs asked whether planning for military action in Mexico was underway; Jenkins declined to comment on specific ongoing deliberations in open session but said it is the department’s obligation to be prepared and to provide options to the president. Jenkins and Fenton said any potential use of military force would involve executive‑branch decisions and, where appropriate, engagement with Congress.
On civilian harm mitigation, Rep. Jacobs thanked witnesses for supporting the civilian‑harm/protection work inside the department; witnesses reiterated the importance of protecting civilians and noted existing centers and training that support that mission.
