Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee gets timeline for three audits: purchasing, health benefits market analysis and correspondence allotment review
Summary
Committee members received status updates: the Council of Great City Schools will present purchasing audit findings in March; the Alara Group expects to deliver a health benefits market analysis in early March after finalizing data-sharing agreements; and correspondence allotment review is in progress under Andy Ratliff's team.
Get email alerts on the Audit Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Anchorage School District Governance Committee received updates on the committee’s administrative audit plan, including schedule details and next steps for three workstreams: a purchasing audit, a health‑benefits market analysis and a correspondence allotment review.
Dr. Pryor (committee transcript reference) told the committee that the purchasing audit completed by the Council of Great City Schools is scheduled to be presented to the governance committee at the March meeting. The committee will have the opportunity to question reviewers and decide next steps after the presentation.
Marty Lang reported on the health benefits market analysis conducted by the Alara Group. Lang said the district finalized the business-associate agreement with Aetna in January to allow sharing of sensitive plan data and that Alara expects to deliver findings in early March. The district plans a work session with the full board after spring break to review those findings.
Andy Ratliff’s team is conducting the correspondence allotment review; the committee was told the project is detail-oriented and still in progress, with no firm ETA provided for final findings.
Committee members discussed whether the governance committee should adopt a fixed annual audit cadence (for example, one to three audits per year) and emphasized the need to balance new audit work with administrative capacity to implement recommendations. No formal motion to change the audit plan was recorded; committee members asked administration to return findings and proposed next steps once the three workstreams are complete.
Committee Chair Carl Jacobs and board members signaled interest in reconvening to prioritize follow-up and implementation once audit findings are available. Dr. Pryor and staff indicated the purchasing and health analyses should be available in March; correspondence allotment timing remains open.

