Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rail Trails Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee considers renaming rail chapter, new rules and penalties for state rail trails
Summary
The committee reviewed session‑law edits that rename the state chapter to reflect state‑owned railroads and rail trails, add cross‑references, authorize the secretary to adopt rules for interim trail use, and clarify that rule violations carry the existing $300 penalty; staff said language mirrors current practice and statutory prohibitions.
Senate Transportation committee members reviewed changes to rail‑related session law that update chapter titles, add statutory cross‑references and authorize the Transportation Secretary to adopt rules governing interim trail use of state‑owned railroad rights‑of‑way.
Committee staff said the title change — from "state acquisition of railroads" to a broader name referencing state‑owned railroads and rail trails — does not change legal authority but better reflects current practice. The bill adds a new section requiring rules for management of rail‑banked corridors and restates that violations of trail rules are subject to an existing statutory penalty of up to $300.
Agency staff and committee counsel discussed drafting details. One committee member favored referencing the existing statutory penalty rather than re‑stating the dollar amount in multiple places, to avoid inconsistent language later. That drafting change — amending the bill to cross‑reference the existing penalty provision rather than repeating the $300 figure twice — was discussed as a clarifying amendment staff could prepare.
The committee also discussed the policy issues that can arise if private grants are used to finance pilot programs or technology pilots on rail corridors; staff raised procurement and conflict‑of‑interest questions and advised careful drafting to avoid binding the state to a specific vendor if private funds are accepted.
Ending: Committee members signaled general comfort with renaming the chapter and with rulemaking authority, and asked staff to adjust cross‑references to the existing penalty provision for clarity.
