Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Sb181 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends parking code updates to meet Senate Bill 181
Summary
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council adopt amendments to parking requirements to comply with Senate Bill 181; staff said changes are limited to state-required adjustments including garage size, tandem parking rules and minor definition edits.
Get email alerts on the Parking Sb181 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Quentin's Planning Commission on April 8 unanimously forwarded to the City Council a package of code amendments intended to bring local parking rules into compliance with Senate Bill 181 and related state code requirements.
Planning staff explained the changes are primarily technical and intended to match state law language. Staff noted the code would be updated to allow tandem parking where it meets size requirements, correct several use-name inconsistencies (for example, consistent naming of bed-and-breakfast categories) and remove a duplicate assisted-living category that mirrored a health-care facility use.
Staff described a change to the garage-size requirement for single-family homes. The packet initially referenced a decrease from a 24-by-24 standard to 20-by-20; staff also noted that garage-door opening dimensions and prevailing local construction norms meant the practical standard they reviewed led toward a smaller standard used in recent builds. Staff emphasized an important state-code exception: if a single-family detached home is owner-occupied and qualifies as affordable housing at the time of construction, the city cannot require a garage under state law; the only place the city currently requires a garage is for single-family homes within a planned unit development (PUD).
Planning staff (Espin) said, "All of the changes are just to meet state code requirements. We didn't add anything additional." Commissioners expressed reluctance about limits imposed by state law but agreed the local code must conform.
Commissioner Romero moved to recommend approval; a second was recorded. The roll-call vote recorded "yes" from Commissioners Waite, Hoffman, Moke, Romero and Wood. The motion passed unanimously and was forwarded to City Council "reluctantly," according to meeting remarks.
Staff also said they would bring additional code amendments to future commission meetings related to updated subdivision and site-plan flowcharts and other housekeeping items.
The Planning Commission's recommendation will be part of the packet when the City Council considers the ordinance to adopt the amendments required by Senate Bill 181.

