Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Farm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves special-use permit for ground-mounted solar array at 300 N. Sixtieth St., adds safety conditions
Summary
The City Council approved a special-use permit for a ground-mounted solar energy system at 300 North Sixtieth Street, voting to add conditions requiring additional safety and decommissioning measures.
The Belleville City Council approved a special-use permit for a ground-mounted solar energy installation at 300 North Sixtieth Street and amended the permit to include additional safety and decommissioning conditions.
The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval. During council discussion, members and staff addressed questions about electrical-grid impact, environmental protections and how the city would ensure the site is decommissioned at the end of its useful life.
Clifford Cross, director of economic development, planning and zoning, said the proposal exceeds the size limits written for "personal" solar systems and therefore had to be treated under commercial or supplementary regulations. He told the council the permit process requires a decommissioning plan as part of the permit: "So it will be decommissioned in accordance to that, and you don't get the graveyards," he said, noting the permitting process can require protective measures to prevent long-term abandonment.
Council members pressed for clearer assurances. One alderperson asked whether the decommissioning plan could change over time, and Cross said it could, as environmental regulations and standards evolve. Cross added that the city can condition the special-use permit and require additional documentation to address potential leakage, runoff and wildlife protection.
Alderperson Kent moved to amend the special-use permit to require the additional safety measures discussed during the council meeting; the amendment was seconded and carried on a voice vote. The council then voted on the original motion as amended; members approved the special-use permit with the new conditions.
Council discussion referenced inspection and property-maintenance processes: Cross said the city inspects the site during construction like other projects, and that post-construction maintenance complaints would be handled through standard property-maintenance enforcement.
The council did not record a roll-call tally for the SUP vote; the minutes show the amendment and the original motion were both approved by voice vote. The approved permit will be subject to the additional, council-required conditions and to standard permitting reviews by planning staff.
