Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners award impact-fee study RFP to Kimberly Horn & Associates; board hears cost questions

2904106 · April 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved an award of RFP 2025-01 for an impact-fee study to Kimberly Horn and Associates and discussed whether a second task phase would be procured and its maximum potential cost.

WAKULLA COUNTY, Fla. — The board approved awarding a county impact-fee study contract to Kimberly Horn and Associates Inc. and discussed scope and potential second-phase costs before voting 5-0 to accept the consultant agreement.

Staff summarized the background: the county charter review commission recommended a charter amendment requiring the county to commission an impact-fee study beginning in 2025 and every five years thereafter; voters approved that charter amendment in a November 2024 referendum and the county released an RFP in January 2025. The RFP described two tasks. Staff said Task 1 would review the county—apital improvements plan, facility inventory and relevant data.

On Task 2, staff told commissioners the work would proceed only if Task 1 identified capital areas where impact fees could be warranted. The presentation included a not-to-exceed figure for Task 2. One commissioner asked whether Task 2 costs up to $166,000 would return for board approval; staff replied Task 2 had a maximum of $166,000 but that actual costs could be lower and the scope and associated costs would be confirmed before proceeding. Another staff comment noted two responsive proposals had been received.

A commissioner said the dollar figure for total study cost "won't be more than a hundred and $124,000 for this entire impact fee study, if I understand correctly," reflecting a point made in the meeting; staff reiterated Task 2 would only be commissioned if Task 1 justified it.

The board voted 5-0 to accept the award and approve the consulting services agreement as presented.

Ending: Staff will proceed with Task 1 under the approved agreement. If Task 1 identifies the need for Task 2, staff said it will return to the board with scope and cost details before initiating that second phase.