Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Charter Review Board adopts submission rules for amendment proposals; three administrative votes pass
Summary
The Hillsborough County Charter Review Board adopted a formal process for submitting proposed charter amendments, approved routine minutes and appointed a board chaplain during its April meeting. The board set deadlines for staff and legal review intended to give members time to 'noodle' proposals before a vote.
The Hillsborough County Charter Review Board on Tuesday adopted a formal timeline and procedure for members who want to propose charter amendments, and approved two other administrative items.
The board voted to require proposals to be submitted to staff at least 10 business days before a meeting so the county attorney can review them; staff will include vetted proposals in the public packet one week before the meeting. The procedure, moved by Dr. Collins and seconded by Mr. White, also specifies that proposals will be presented at the scheduled meeting and then either moved forward, tabled for more workshopping or otherwise disposed of by a subsequent vote. The motion passed by voice vote; a roll-call tally was not recorded in the minutes.
Board members said the new rule is intended to give members time to review legal issues and to discuss proposals without repeatedly delaying action. "If it's fully presented and we've got everything, I'm gonna ask for a vote," the chair said during debate, describing the new sequence of submission, legal vetting, presentation and disposition.
The meeting also included two other procedural votes. The board approved the minutes from the February and March meetings after a motion by Miss Holt; the motion carried by voice vote (tally not specified). Later in the session, members moved to appoint the meeting's regular invocation leader as an official board chaplain for the 2025 term; that motion was seconded by Mr. Roche and carried by voice vote.
Why this matters: The timetable sets an explicit, public schedule for how and when amendment language is circulated and reviewed. Board members said the change aims to reduce last-minute proposals and allow the county attorney and staff time to check proposals for legal sufficiency before they reach the public packet.
What the rule requires: proposals submitted 10 business days before the meeting; county legal review; packet distribution to board members one week prior; presentation at the meeting; and a formal disposition (vote, further study or referral to staff) afterward.
Votes at a glance: - Approval of minutes (February & March): Mover — Miss Holt; Second — not specified in transcript; Outcome — approved (voice vote, tally not specified). - Procedure for submission of charter amendment proposals: Mover — Dr. Collins; Second — Mr. White; Outcome — approved (voice vote, tally not specified). - Appointment of board chaplain (nominee identified in meeting as Mr. *****): Mover — Mr. White; Second — Mr. Roche; Outcome — approved (voice vote, tally not specified).
The board said the new rules do not eliminate the option to workshop items; members keep discretion to table proposals or request additional information before a final vote. Legal counsel confirmed staff will vet proposals once submitted under the new timetable.
