Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Forestry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alders press for clearer role and stronger urban-forest protections as canopy declines
Summary
Alders and staff discussed the Parks Committee’s role vs. the county park commission and urged more active oversight of urban forestry decisions after widespread tree removals tied to street work and emerald ash borer control.
Get email alerts on the Urban Forestry topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee members on April 7 urged clearer lines between the City of Wausau Parks and Recreation Committee and the county Park Commission and pressed for a more proactive approach to urban forestry after members reported significant tree removals tied to street projects and emerald ash borer responses.
Alder O’Neil said the city’s canopy is “disappearing dramatically” and urged the committee to be more active in preserving mature trees and advocating for phased removals where appropriate. Alder O’Neil asked the committee to act on canopy preservation rather than learning of removals after the fact.
Jamie explained that the county Park Commission retains jurisdiction over some operations and that the status quo stems from an intergovernmental agreement and an ordinance that date back to 1974, and said changes to the commission’s makeup or authority would need to go through the county rules-review committee and take time. Jamie proposed maintaining a city parks committee for city-specific leases and projects while the Park Commission would continue to handle department-level policy, budgets and capital projects; the Park Commission could meet quarterly if the governance change proceeds.
Alder Rasmussen and others said they support keeping city representation on the Park Commission while any governance changes are pending so the city retains votes where county and city facilities overlap. Committee members requested a formal urban-forestry update and recommended inviting the city forester and the city engineer to a future meeting to discuss street‑reconstruction impacts, species diversity, replanting strategies and grants to support tree replacement.
Committee members also noted recent examples where reconstruction removed large numbers of boulevard trees and asked staff to pull existing urban-forestry guidelines for review. Jamie said the forester would be asked to present and that staff are tracking emerald ash borer treatment and replanting targets through their canopy management plan and related grants.
No formal action was taken; committee members asked staff to schedule an urban-forestry presentation, to review guidance and to coordinate with infrastructure staff before major street projects.

