Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maryland Environmental Service briefs Talbot County on landfill operations, proposes tipping fee increases
Summary
Maryland Environmental Service presented tonnage trends, a new compactor that improved compaction and proposed FY26 tipping-fee increases that could cost the county roughly $30,000 a year; county administrators asked for options and testing alternatives for sewage sludge surcharges.
Representatives from Maryland Environmental Service (MES) told the Talbot County Council on April 8 that county transfer station and landfill tonnages have been steady at roughly 40,000 tons per year and that the transfer station handled about 36,000 customer transactions over a rolling 12-month period.
MES managing director Tim Ford and Senior Project Manager Gary Laseko reviewed operations at the Mitchell 1 transfer station and Midshore 2 landfill (Ridgeley). They said a pilot of a Swedish-made Tana compactor delivered 15–20% improved compaction, reduced soil usage and lowered fuel consumption while improving operator visibility and safety; MES purchased the compactor and put it into service in February.
MES also presented preliminary budget proposals for fiscal 2026, including a proposed increase in tipping fees for trash to $71.50 per ton (a $1.50 increase), brush to $46.50 per ton and a proposed $15 per ton charge for sewage sludge. For transfer-station customers, MES said the effective rates (including a surcharge to fund transfer operations) would be $81.50 per ton for trash and $56.50 per ton for brush; homeowner drop-off fees proposed were a $5 single-use fee or $10 and $20 punch-card options.
MES explained the sludge surcharge partly reflects new regulatory testing and monitoring requirements for PFAS and other contaminants; sludge commonly carries higher PFAS concentrations and monitoring costs have increased. MES said the proposed sludge fee could cost Talbot County about $30,000 annually. MES said it is considering a test-out option for counties whose sludge tests show low PFAS and is continuing to look for budget savings and alternatives.
Council members and administrators pressed MES to continue exploring options to limit impacts on residents and municipalities. Several council members praised MES’s operational responsiveness and asked staff to return with options, including the PFAS test-out approach and other budget savings that could reduce the proposed increase.
Ending: MES will continue developing the FY26 budget, consider a test-out approach for sludge PFAS levels and work with county administrators on alternatives to minimize cost impact; council asked staff to report back before finalizing fees.
