Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears petitions and resident testimony on removing speed bumps on East First Street; no decision made

2902424 · April 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents and board members offered competing views on removing two speed bumps on East First Street; the board treated the item as fact-finding and will revisit it at its April 21 meeting.

The Board of Public Works and Safety on April 7 heard a petition and public testimony regarding removal of two speed bumps on East First Street between Harrison and Saint Michael’s.

Councilwoman Krebs presented a petition collected by a resident asking that the speed bumps be removed. Charles Bursch, a resident at 204 Saint Michael’s Avenue whose property adjoins First Street, said the speed bump nearest his alley is necessary to slow traffic so he can safely back out of his driveway. Bursch said he had worked with staff and former police officers when the bumps were originally installed and described neighborhood pedestrian and golf-cart traffic.

Other speakers described steep grades, increased pedestrian use related to nearby businesses and festival activity, and past Traffic Committee consideration. Jan Vehtrus (spelling captured from the meeting) said the hill is steep and that parked cars and limited sidewalks increase pedestrian exposure. Patrick Tavanagh told the board the council traffic committee had recently reviewed the matter and did not find a need to remove the bumps at this time.

Board members asked clarifying questions about when the bumps were installed and whether tort claims had been filed for vehicle damage. Staff said the top bump sits between two stop signs and suggested alternative measures such as signage and a wider, lower “pillow” speed bump could be considered.

No action was taken; the board characterized the hearing as fact-finding and said the issue will be evaluated and discussed at the next meeting on April 21. Residents were encouraged to contact their council representative or attend the April 21 meeting.