Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education.statute Language topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Education Committee advances amended House Bill 1181 after debate over Chapter 1 placement and records scope
Summary
Lawmakers debated the placement and breadth of House Bill 1181, which would alter statutory language related to gender and related references in Chapter 1 of the North Dakota Century Code. The committee struck a contested subsection, then approved the bill as amended and sent it out of committee with a carrier assigned.
The Senate Education Committee considered House Bill 1181, a measure proposing a broad list of items related to gender language and references in Chapter 1 of the North Dakota Century Code.
Committee members expressed confusion about placing prescriptive policy language in Chapter 1 (the structural chapter that governs how code is written) and raised concerns that certain subsections could have far-reaching effects on records and forms maintained by state agencies, hospitals, human-service centers and education institutions.
Senator Axman moved a "do not pass" recommendation on House Bill 1181; Senator Moshe seconded the motion. The committee voted on the do-not-pass motion: 2 yeas, 4 nays, 0 not voting; the motion failed.
Senator Axman then moved an amendment to strike subsection 3 of the bill. The amendment was seconded by Senator Moshe. The committee voted to adopt the amendment to strike subsection 3, with a tally of 4 yeas and 2 nays. Members who supported the amendment said it reduced placement and wording conflicts; opponents said subsection 3 reflected the sponsor’s intent.
After adopting the amendment, the committee voted on a motion to give House Bill 1181 a "do pass" recommendation as amended. The motion passed 5 yeas and 1 nay. The bill was reported out of committee with Senator Lem as the carrier to the next stage.
Committee debate stressed the potential consequences of broadly defining "records" and related terms: senators noted that if the statute’s language were overly expansive, it could affect medical or counseling records, human-service documentation and other sensitive files. Some senators urged addressing concerns with targeted amendments rather than rejecting the bill outright.
The committee’s formal actions on the record were: a failed do-not-pass motion (2–4), passage of an amendment striking subsection 3 (4–2), and a do-pass-as-amended recommendation (5–1). The bill leaves committee with an assigned carrier and will move forward in the legislative process.
