Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves juvenile criminal‑code changes and $300,000 appropriation in SB 20‑37 after amendment
Summary
Appropriations voted to give Senate Bill 20‑37 a due‑pass recommendation as amended; the bill changes some juvenile criminal‑code proceedings language (replacing “fitness to proceed” with “lack of criminal responsibility”) and includes a $300,000 appropriation to contract for evaluations.
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative O’Brien explained the committee’s amendments to Senate Bill 20‑37, which came from the Judiciary Committee and affect juvenile code proceedings. The section changes include directing juvenile investigations “pursuant to chapter 27‑20.3” and replacing the phrase “fitness to proceed” with “lack of criminal responsibility” in the portion that establishes appropriations. The committee’s HR section reviewed the bill and the Appropriations Committee decided to adopt an amendment before voting on the bill.
Representative O’Brien moved a due‑pass on SB 20‑37 as amended. Members discussed the appropriation: Representative Nelson and others said the $300,000 is intended to contract with outside providers (forensic psychologists) to perform evaluations that zone systems currently lack; some members opposed adding one‑time funding for a program they thought would be ongoing. Representative Murphy noted the department anticipated using telehealth where possible and traveling to juveniles when necessary. Representative Wagner urged caution on appropriations and suggested DHS should be able to reallocate existing funds if necessary; Representative Nelson argued that a new program should have specific funding for initial implementation and be reviewed in the next biennium.
The committee adopted the amendment and then took a due‑pass on SB 20‑37 as amended. The due‑pass as amended passed on roll call 17‑4 with 2 not voting. Committee discussion indicated the bill’s sponsor (originally Christiansen in the Senate) might change the carrier; Representative O’Brien agreed to carry the measure forward if needed.
