Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the K 12 Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews K–12 funding bill with per-pupil increases, bid-threshold changes and school-construction loan transfer

2902236 · April 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Appropriations — E&E reviewed bill 13 69, which sets K–12 per-pupil payments, raises public-bid thresholds and would transfer $75 million to the school construction revolving loan fund.

Committee members reviewed a K–12 funding and school construction bill (referred to in committee as 13 69) that sets per-pupil payments, adjusts procurement thresholds and directs a transfer to the school construction loan fund.

Senator Shively told the panel: "It sets the, the per pupil payment for $11,293 for the first year of the biennium and $11,519 for the second year of the biennium." He said the bill as engrossed carried a fiscal note reflecting about a $91,000,000 increase under a 2-and-2 per-pupil schedule. Shively also described changes in procurement rules: "Section 3 and 4 are bidding thresholds... Now, goes to over $250,000 of both of them," raising the dollar thresholds that trigger formal bidding.

Shively said the bill removes a 12% cap on new local levy money tied to 60-mill levies and that removal has ramifications if the state adopts a different property-tax cap elsewhere. He also explained a policy change moving $75,000,000 from the Foundation Aid Stabilization Fund to the school construction revolving loan fund, and proposed raising that transfer to $100,000,000 in amendments he intends to offer.

The sponsor indicated he may propose a 3-and-3 per-pupil payment schedule in conference, which he estimated would reduce the net fiscal change from the 2-and-2 baseline (a 3-and-3 would translate to roughly a $46,500,000 increase rather than $91,000,000). Committee members said the bill will be revisited in committee the next day to reconcile tax-relief proposals and other policy changes.

Ending: No final vote was taken; sponsors will prepare amendments and return with updated fiscal figures and language for further committee consideration.